Gloucester
Summary
What do your icons mean? (Click To Expand)
In places where we can't include the full text of the question, we use icons to give you a quick idea of what the question is about, or how a person has answered. Here's what they mean:
Answers
- The Candidate replied YES: they agree with the statement
- The Candidate replied NO: they do not agree with the statement
- The candidate has been asked, either by us or you, but we've had no response, or they refused to answer
- We haven't been able to contact the candidate yet
Questions
- The police should stop placing persons on ‘hate’ registers who have committed no crime.
- Parents and psychotherapists should be free to advise young persons and others *not* to change sex/gender.
- It is wrong for teachers to tell school kids that Britain is a ‘structurally racist' society.
- An official state definition of 'Islamophobia' will curtail our right to be critical of a religion?
- Everyone should have the freedom to speak their mind which includes the right to offend and hold controversial views.
Special Icons
- The candidate has answered YES to every question, and we've awarded them a Free Speech Champion badge
We use data from Democracy Club to provide information about candidates and elections.
If you see data that is missing or incorrect, please let us know and we will update our information and send on to Democracy Club to help improve their data.
If you see data that is missing or incorrect, please let us know and we will update our information and send on to Democracy Club to help improve their data.
Do you agree that...
The police should stop placing persons on ‘hate’ registers who have committed no crime.
Parents and psychotherapists should be free to advise young persons and others *not* to change sex/gender.
It is wrong for teachers to tell school kids that Britain is a ‘structurally racist' society.
An official state definition of 'Islamophobia' will curtail our right to be critical of a religion?
Everyone should have the freedom to speak their mind which includes the right to offend and hold controversial views.
Adam Shearing
grn
Do you agree that...
The police should stop placing persons on ‘hate’ registers who have committed no crime.
Parents and psychotherapists should be free to advise young persons and others *not* to change sex/gender.
It is wrong for teachers to tell school kids that Britain is a ‘structurally racist' society.
An official state definition of 'Islamophobia' will curtail our right to be critical of a religion?
Everyone should have the freedom to speak their mind which includes the right to offend and hold controversial views.
Do you agree that...
The police should stop placing persons on ‘hate’ registers who have committed no crime.
Parents and psychotherapists should be free to advise young persons and others *not* to change sex/gender.
It is wrong for teachers to tell school kids that Britain is a ‘structurally racist' society.
An official state definition of 'Islamophobia' will curtail our right to be critical of a religion?
Everyone should have the freedom to speak their mind which includes the right to offend and hold controversial views.
Do you agree that...
The police should stop placing persons on ‘hate’ registers who have committed no crime.
Parents and psychotherapists should be free to advise young persons and others *not* to change sex/gender.
It is wrong for teachers to tell school kids that Britain is a ‘structurally racist' society.
An official state definition of 'Islamophobia' will curtail our right to be critical of a religion?
Everyone should have the freedom to speak their mind which includes the right to offend and hold controversial views.
Do you agree that...
The police should stop placing persons on ‘hate’ registers who have committed no crime.
Parents and psychotherapists should be free to advise young persons and others *not* to change sex/gender.
It is wrong for teachers to tell school kids that Britain is a ‘structurally racist' society.
An official state definition of 'Islamophobia' will curtail our right to be critical of a religion?
Everyone should have the freedom to speak their mind which includes the right to offend and hold controversial views.
Do you agree that...
The police should stop placing persons on ‘hate’ registers who have committed no crime.
Parents and psychotherapists should be free to advise young persons and others *not* to change sex/gender.
It is wrong for teachers to tell school kids that Britain is a ‘structurally racist' society.
An official state definition of 'Islamophobia' will curtail our right to be critical of a religion?
Everyone should have the freedom to speak their mind which includes the right to offend and hold controversial views.
Do you agree that...
The police should stop placing persons on ‘hate’ registers who have committed no crime.
Parents and psychotherapists should be free to advise young persons and others *not* to change sex/gender.
It is wrong for teachers to tell school kids that Britain is a ‘structurally racist' society.
An official state definition of 'Islamophobia' will curtail our right to be critical of a religion?
Everyone should have the freedom to speak their mind which includes the right to offend and hold controversial views.
Do you agree that...
The police should stop placing persons on ‘hate’ registers who have committed no crime.
Parents and psychotherapists should be free to advise young persons and others *not* to change sex/gender.
It is wrong for teachers to tell school kids that Britain is a ‘structurally racist' society.
An official state definition of 'Islamophobia' will curtail our right to be critical of a religion?
Everyone should have the freedom to speak their mind which includes the right to offend and hold controversial views.
I am concerned that free speech in Britain is under threat. To help me
understand your position on free speech issues please answer the following
YES/NO questions and send your answers by reply and cc
answers@justanswerthequestion.co.uk Your answers will be held on the website
www.justanswerthequestion.co.uk and promoted via social media. Please answer
the following questions with either a YES or NO.
1. Do you agree that the police should stop placing persons on ‘hate’ registers who have committed no crime?
YES or NO
2. Do you agree that parents and psychotherapists should be free to advise young persons and others *not* to change sex/gender?
YES or NO
3. Do you believe that it is wrong for teachers to tell school kids that Britain is a ‘structurally racist' society?
YES or NO
4. Do you agree that an official state definition of 'Islamophobia' will curtail our right to be critical of a religion?
YES or NO
5. Do you agree that everyone should have the freedom to speak their mind which includes the right to offend and hold controversial views?
YES or NO
I have provided some context below why we believe these questions are
important and more detailed information can be found at
www.justanswerthequestion.co.uk/questions. Best wishes, Context to
questions: 1. Non Crime Hate Incidents (NCHI): Approximately 120,000 NCHIs
have been recorded by the police on a database although no criminal act has
been carried out. Many targeted individuals have simply challenged the
definition of biological sex. These incidents can be disclosed to potential
employers, creating a chilling effect on free speech. 2. Conversion Therapy
Ban: Proposed legislation could criminalise parents and psychotherapists for
advising against sex change procedures, intruding into family and
therapeutic settings. Consenting private conversations will become
suppressed. 3. Critical Race Theory (CRT) in Schools: A study by Professor
Eric Kaufmann found that 59% of British schoolchildren are exposed to
CRT-derived terms, often taught as undisputed facts. This unbalanced
approach undermines open debate and imposes a singular perspective on
controversial topics on young minds. 4. Official ‘Islamophobia’ Definition:
A proposed new definition conflates criticism of Islam with racism, risking
a return to blasphemy laws and limiting robust debate about religious
ideologies.
I am concerned that free speech in Britain is under threat. To help me understand your position on free speech issues please answer the following YES/NO questions and send your answers by reply and cc answers@justanswerthequestion.co.uk
Your answers will be held on the website www.justanswerthequestion.co.uk and promoted via social media.
Please answer the following questions with either a YES or NO.
- Do you agree that the police should stop placing persons on ‘hate’ registers who have committed no crime?
YES or NO - Do you agree that parents and psychotherapists should be free to advise young persons and others *not* to change sex/gender?
YES or NO - Do you believe that it is wrong for teachers to tell school kids that Britain is a ‘structurally racist' society?
YES or NO - Do you agree that an official state definition of 'Islamophobia' will curtail our right to be critical of a religion?
YES or NO - Do you agree that everyone should have the freedom to speak their mind which includes the right to offend and hold controversial views?
YES or NO
I have provided some context below why we believe these questions are important and more detailed information can be found on the justanswerthequestion.co.uk website.
Best wishes,
Context to questions:
1. Non Crime Hate Incidents (NCHI): Approximately 120,000 NCHIs have been recorded by the police on a database although no criminal act has been carried out. Many targeted individuals have simply challenged the definition of biological sex. These incidents can be disclosed to potential employers, creating a chilling effect on free speech.
2. Conversion Therapy Ban: Proposed legislation could criminalise parents and psychotherapists for advising against sex change procedures, intruding into family and therapeutic settings. Consenting private conversations will become suppressed.
3. Critical Race Theory (CRT) in Schools: A study by Professor Eric Kaufmann found that 59% of British schoolchildren are exposed to CRT-derived terms, often taught as undisputed facts. This unbalanced approach undermines open debate and imposes a singular perspective on controversial topics on young minds.
4. Official ‘Islamophobia’ Definition: A proposed new definition conflates criticism of Islam with racism, risking a return to blasphemy laws and limiting robust debate about religious ideologies.